Jeff Allain
2004-11-09 02:42:51 UTC
I believe my problem to be with vmware. I have a samba server setup on my
Fedora Core 2 box, and I am running a laptop with Fedora installed on it
as well. I installed win2k in Vmware on the laptop and when I use my
internal nic with bridged networking, everything works fine. I want to use
my wireless, so I had to change to NAT. This is where my problem comes in.
I can see my samba sever, but no shares from the win2k guest. I can run
the command nbtstat -a (server name) and it fails. I run the same command
by IP address and it works fine. I don't want to set up static IP's, so my
basic question is this. Why does it work ok using bridged networking and
eth0, but not wireless using NAT and ath0? It seems that the name
resolving does not work with NAT, or am I being led astray? By the way,
the guest can browse the shares from the samba server running on the
laptop, but not the main samba server running on my main machine. I have
disabled samba on the laptop and it makes no difference. Any help would be
appreciated.
Jeff Allain
Fedora Core 2 box, and I am running a laptop with Fedora installed on it
as well. I installed win2k in Vmware on the laptop and when I use my
internal nic with bridged networking, everything works fine. I want to use
my wireless, so I had to change to NAT. This is where my problem comes in.
I can see my samba sever, but no shares from the win2k guest. I can run
the command nbtstat -a (server name) and it fails. I run the same command
by IP address and it works fine. I don't want to set up static IP's, so my
basic question is this. Why does it work ok using bridged networking and
eth0, but not wireless using NAT and ath0? It seems that the name
resolving does not work with NAT, or am I being led astray? By the way,
the guest can browse the shares from the samba server running on the
laptop, but not the main samba server running on my main machine. I have
disabled samba on the laptop and it makes no difference. Any help would be
appreciated.
Jeff Allain